PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGO vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGO vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
-25.13%25.49%101.65%240.10%-71.55%0.88%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-10.70%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a -25.13% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -10.70% return.


FNGO

1D
8.94%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-25.13%
6M
-30.39%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
51.07%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*

IFED

1D
2.06%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
-10.70%
6M
-11.02%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGO vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGO vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGOIFEDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

0.29

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

0.52

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.07

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.39

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.78

1.24

+0.54

FNGO vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and IFED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGOIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.29

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and IFED is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FNGO vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGO nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and IFED.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGOIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.39%

-22.36%

-56.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.73%

-14.65%

-28.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.61%

-12.52%

-25.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.16%

-5.70%

-18.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.00%

4.64%

+10.36%

Volatility

FNGO vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.91%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGOIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.84%

4.91%

+10.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.38%

10.83%

+19.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.54%

18.80%

+35.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.28%

19.72%

+40.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.91%

19.72%

+42.19%