FNGO vs. DIVI
FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. FNGO is passively managed, while DIVI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGO returned 25.62%/yr vs 13.55%/yr for DIVI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FNGO vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 11.97% return.
FNGO
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 26.54%
- 3Y*
- 49.78%
- 5Y*
- 25.62%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- 1Y
- 25.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
FNGO vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 8.91% | 25.49% | 101.65% | 240.10% | -71.55% | 28.38% | 238.00% | 79.61% | -39.85% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 11.97% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGO and DIVI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FNGO and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNGO vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNGO
DIVI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FNGO
DIVI
Communication Services
FNGO
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FNGO
DIVI
Financial Services
FNGO
DIVI
Basic Materials
FNGO
-
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FNGO
-
DIVI
Energy
FNGO
-
DIVI
Healthcare
FNGO
-
DIVI
Industrials
FNGO
-
DIVI
Real Estate
FNGO
-
DIVI
Utilities
FNGO
-
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGO vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FNGO
DIVI
FNGO vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGO | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.30 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.44 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 9.36 | -7.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGO vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGO | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.39% | -27.76% | -50.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.73% | -10.54% | -32.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.64% | -14.58% | -33.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.39% | -18.53% | -59.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.46% | -0.05% | -18.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.87% | -3.62% | -20.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.45% | 2.75% | +13.70% |
Volatility
FNGO vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) at 5.63%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGO | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.58% | 5.63% | +11.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.63% | 12.85% | +20.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.88% | 15.39% | +26.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.50% | 15.40% | +45.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.61% | 16.49% | +45.12% |
FNGO vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGO vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.50% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGO and DIVI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGO has higher volatility (17.58%) compared to DIVI (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, FNGO leads with 25.62% vs 13.55% for DIVI. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNGO has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGO.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.00% for FNGO.
FNGO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGO and 0.09% for DIVI.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGO and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer