FNGO vs. ARKF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. FNGO is passively managed, while ARKF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGO returned 25.62%/yr vs -5.06%/yr for ARKF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKF.

Performance

FNGO vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -18.31% return.

FNGO

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -7.03%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 49.78%
• 5Y*: 25.62%
• 10Y*: —

ARKF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: -18.31%
• 6M: -21.31%
• 1Y: -11.87%
• 3Y*: 23.97%
• 5Y*: -5.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGO vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	8.91%	25.49%	101.65%	240.10%	-71.55%	28.38%	238.00%	43.45%
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	-18.31%	28.67%	34.34%	93.27%	-65.07%	-17.82%	108.03%	20.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and ARKF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2019	0.77

The correlation between FNGO and ARKF shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNGO vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGO	ARKF
Technology	59.9%	42.7%
Communication Services	28.8%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	16.4%
Financial Services	10.0%	28.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.2%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGO vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 20
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

ARKF

ARKF Risk / Return Rank: 7
ARKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ARKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ARKF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ARKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ARKF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGO	ARKF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	-0.35	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	-0.28	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.97	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	-0.31	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	-0.57	+2.18

FNGO vs. ARKF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the ARKF Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and ARKF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and ARKF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGO	ARKF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.39%	-78.63%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.73%	-38.50%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.64%	-38.50%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.39%	-75.30%	-3.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.46%	-38.77%	+20.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.87%	-34.95%	+11.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.45%	21.00%	-4.55%

Volatility

FNGO vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) at 10.36%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGO	ARKF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.58%	10.36%	+7.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.63%	25.14%	+8.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.88%	33.69%	+8.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.50%	42.87%	+17.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.61%	39.77%	+21.84%

FNGO vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGO vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	0.11%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	1.25%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGO and ARKF in my portfolio?

FNGO and ARKF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGO or ARKF?

FNGO has higher volatility (17.58%) compared to ARKF (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs ARKF's -78.63%.

Which ETF is better, FNGO or ARKF?

On 5-year performance, FNGO leads with 25.62% vs -5.06% for ARKF. On fees, ARKF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARKF has been the lower-risk option at 10.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGO or ARKF?

Over the 5-year period, FNGO has performed better with a 25.62% return vs -5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGO or ARKF?

ARKF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGO or ARKF?

ARKF has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FNGO.

What is the main difference between FNGO and ARKF?

FNGO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ARKF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGO and 0.75% for ARKF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.