PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKF vs. XLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKF vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKF achieves a -16.75% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 4.86% return.


ARKF

1D
-2.10%
1M
-3.22%
6M
-8.41%
YTD
-16.75%
1Y
-22.13%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
-4.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.71%

XLF

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.37%
6M
7.47%
YTD
4.86%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
13.69%
ALL TIME*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.49M$5.67M$7.32M
$1.84B$1.93B$1.92B

ARKF vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ARKF
ARK Fintech Innovation ETF
-16.75%28.67%34.34%93.27%-65.07%-17.82%108.03%20.45%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
4.86%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%20.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKF and XLF is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2019

0.50

The correlation between ARKF and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKF vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKF
XLF

Technology

41.9%
1.6%

Financial Services

30.3%
98.2%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%

-

Communication Services

11.7%

-

Healthcare

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ARKF
41.9%
XLF
1.6%

Financial Services

ARKF
30.3%
XLF
98.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKF
16.0%
XLF

-

Communication Services

ARKF
11.7%
XLF

-

Healthcare

ARKF
0.2%
XLF

-

Basic Materials

ARKF

-

XLF

-

Consumer Defensive

ARKF

-

XLF

-

Energy

ARKF

-

XLF

-

Industrials

ARKF

-

XLF
0.2%

Real Estate

ARKF

-

XLF

-

Utilities

ARKF

-

XLF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKF vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARKF
ARKF Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ARKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKF Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARKF vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKFXLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.13

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

0.71

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

1.80

-2.90

ARKF vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKF Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKF and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKF vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKF drawdown since its inception was -78.63%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKF and XLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKFXLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.63%

-82.69%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.50%

-14.79%

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.50%

-15.54%

-22.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.30%

-25.81%

-49.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.60%

-1.15%

-36.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.98%

-19.92%

-15.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.82%

5.79%

+18.03%

Volatility

ARKF vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.07%. This indicates that ARKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKFXLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

4.07%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.23%

11.10%

+15.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.01%

14.77%

+19.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.99%

18.45%

+24.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.63%

22.08%

+17.55%

ARKF vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKF vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XLF's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKF
ARK Fintech Innovation ETF
0.11%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.42%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKF and XLF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKF has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to XLF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKF dropped -78.63% vs XLF's -82.69%.

On 5-year performance, XLF leads with 11.20% vs -4.77% for ARKF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLF has performed better with a 11.20% return vs -4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.

XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.11% for ARKF.

ARKF is categorized as Blockchain, while XLF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKF and 0.08% for XLF.

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKF and XLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer