FNGAX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNGAX (Franklin International Growth Fund Class A) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FNGAX returned -3.30%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for GSIMX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGAX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 6.45% return.

FNGAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: -0.64%
• 6M: -0.87%
• 1Y: -0.61%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -3.30%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 12.69%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A	-0.64%	10.48%	0.37%	15.00%	-32.05%	1.17%	32.56%	36.91%	-14.53%	36.29%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	6.45%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	27.64%	-6.04%	29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGAX and GSIMX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FNGAX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FNGAX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGAX

FNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGAX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.27	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	1.78	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.23	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	1.56	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.16	5.22	-5.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGAX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGAX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	1.27	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	0.63	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.82	-0.62

Drawdowns

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGAX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-28.84%	-24.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-7.81%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.26%	-10.32%	-12.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.24%	-25.37%	-21.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.55%	-3.70%	-17.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.17%	-4.82%	-9.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.06%	2.33%	+3.73%

Volatility

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.77%. This indicates that FNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGAX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.67%	2.77%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	7.89%	+5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.28%	9.66%	+7.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.34%	14.36%	+6.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.33%	15.69%	+4.64%

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGAX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than GSIMX's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A	3.28%	3.36%	1.86%	0.00%	1.75%	1.80%	2.22%	0.13%	1.94%	1.31%	0.53%	0.01%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.81%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGAX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

FNGAX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGAX or GSIMX?

FNGAX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to GSIMX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGAX dropped -53.35% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.