FNDF vs. WMT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FNDF returned 12.34%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for WMT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FNDF vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 12.34%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.

FNDF

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.91%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 21.60%
• 1Y: 41.60%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

WMT

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -7.92%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 4.13%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 34.18%
• 5Y*: 22.42%
• 10Y*: 19.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	19.66%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%
WMT Walmart Inc.	9.07%	24.49%	73.99%	12.88%	-0.46%	1.97%	23.32%	30.16%	-3.43%	46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and WMT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between FNDF and WMT has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FNDF vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 76
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDF	WMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	1.22	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	1.79	+1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.23	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	1.83	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	5.82	+8.45

FNDF vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and WMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDF	WMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-77.14%	+37.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-15.75%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-21.93%	+8.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	-25.74%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.14%	-25.74%	-14.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.94%	-9.81%	+7.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.63%	-14.63%	+7.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	4.94%	-2.10%

Volatility

FNDF vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is 6.65%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that FNDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDF	WMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	9.86%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.64%	18.49%	-4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.00%	23.67%	-7.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.35%	21.68%	-5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	21.73%	-4.02%

Dividends

FNDF vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.87%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.80%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDF and WMT in my portfolio?

FNDF and WMT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDF or WMT?

WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to FNDF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs WMT's -77.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.