PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDF vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDF vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 18.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has outperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 11.87%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.


FNDF

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.05%
6M
10.61%
YTD
21.52%
1Y
39.70%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
11.87%
ALL TIME*
9.15%

VYMI

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.87%
6M
9.05%
YTD
18.10%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$80.54M$73.00M$75.40M
$80.67M$80.96M$91.44M

FNDF vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
21.52%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
18.10%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-1.11%18.43%-12.65%22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and VYMI is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2016

0.96

The correlation between FNDF and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDF
VYMI

Financial Services

20.2%
42.4%

Industrials

12.8%
6.1%

Technology

11.5%
5.3%

Energy

10.6%
7.9%

Basic Materials

10.0%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
6.7%

Healthcare

6.0%
6.5%

Utilities

4.3%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.1%

Financial Services

FNDF
20.2%
VYMI
42.4%

Industrials

FNDF
12.8%
VYMI
6.1%

Technology

FNDF
11.5%
VYMI
5.3%

Energy

FNDF
10.6%
VYMI
7.9%

Basic Materials

FNDF
10.0%
VYMI
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDF
8.2%
VYMI
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

FNDF
6.2%
VYMI
6.7%

Healthcare

FNDF
6.0%
VYMI
6.5%

Utilities

FNDF
4.3%
VYMI
5.2%

Communication Services

FNDF
3.4%
VYMI
3.5%

Real Estate

FNDF
0.9%
VYMI
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDF vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDF vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDFVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.32

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

13.09

+0.09

FNDF vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, roughly equal to the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDFVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-40.00%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-10.14%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-12.84%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-24.05%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

-40.00%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.05%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-6.22%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.56%

+0.46%

Volatility

FNDF vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 3.27%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDFVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.27%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

11.27%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

13.17%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

14.85%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

16.55%

+0.89%

FNDF vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDF vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than VYMI's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
3.00%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.46%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNDF and VYMI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDF has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VYMI (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.87% vs 11.00% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.87% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 3.00% for FNDF.

FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.07% for VYMI.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDF and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer