PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDF vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDF vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 13.78% return.


FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
1.01%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
40.25%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%

LVHI

1D
0.49%
1M
1.30%
YTD
13.78%
6M
14.96%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.78%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and LVHI is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.72

The correlation between FNDF and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDF
LVHI

Financial Services

16.7%
23.6%

Industrials

15.9%
13.4%

Energy

12.3%
17.4%

Basic Materials

11.3%
6.1%

Technology

11.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
8.7%

Healthcare

5.5%
7.4%

Communication Services

4.9%
5.8%

Utilities

3.8%
10.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Financial Services

FNDF
16.7%
LVHI
23.6%

Industrials

FNDF
15.9%
LVHI
13.4%

Energy

FNDF
12.3%
LVHI
17.4%

Basic Materials

FNDF
11.3%
LVHI
6.1%

Technology

FNDF
11.1%
LVHI
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDF
10.7%
LVHI
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

FNDF
6.9%
LVHI
8.7%

Healthcare

FNDF
5.5%
LVHI
7.4%

Communication Services

FNDF
4.9%
LVHI
5.8%

Utilities

FNDF
3.8%
LVHI
10.4%

Real Estate

FNDF
0.9%
LVHI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDF vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDFLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.63

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

5.23

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.27

21.61

-7.35

FNDF vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDFLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-32.31%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-6.08%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-11.99%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-11.99%

-13.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

0.00%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-3.51%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.48%

+1.36%

Volatility

FNDF vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.78%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDFLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

2.78%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

7.72%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

9.60%

+6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

11.08%

+5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

13.75%

+3.96%

FNDF vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDF vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than LVHI's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.69%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDF and LVHI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 13.11% for FNDF. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.

FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDF and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer