FNDF vs. IXN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDF returned 11.78%/yr vs 24.76%/yr for IXN. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.

Performance

FNDF vs. IXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 32.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has underperformed IXN with an annualized return of 11.78%, while IXN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.76% annualized return.

FNDF

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 17.34%
• 6M: 20.48%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 12.75%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

IXN

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 32.00%
• 6M: 30.10%
• 1Y: 61.63%
• 3Y*: 33.24%
• 5Y*: 21.65%
• 10Y*: 24.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	17.34%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF	32.00%	25.25%	24.84%	52.98%	-29.86%	29.58%	43.62%	47.88%	-5.44%	41.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and IXN is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.67

The correlation between FNDF and IXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDF vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDF	IXN
Financial Services	16.7%	-
Industrials	15.9%	0.2%
Energy	12.3%	0.1%
Basic Materials	11.3%	-
Technology	11.1%	99.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	-
Healthcare	5.5%	0.1%
Communication Services	4.9%	-
Utilities	3.8%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	0.0%

Return for Risk

FNDF vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

IXN

IXN Risk / Return Rank: 84
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDF	IXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.65	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.19	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.44	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	4.49	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.05	15.19	-1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDF vs. IXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the IXN Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and IXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDF	IXN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.65	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.87	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	1.01	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.53	-0.01

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum IXN drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and IXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDF	IXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-55.67%	+15.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-13.80%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-25.55%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	-36.30%	+10.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.14%	-36.30%	-3.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-7.44%	+3.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-11.27%	+3.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	4.07%	-1.27%

Volatility

FNDF vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is 5.97%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that FNDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDF	IXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	11.51%	-5.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	19.70%	-6.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.60%	23.42%	-7.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	25.08%	-8.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	24.53%	-6.82%

FNDF vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDF vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than IXN's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.93%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF	0.79%	1.04%	0.43%	0.55%	0.81%	0.58%	0.63%	1.06%	0.94%	0.93%	1.03%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDF and IXN in my portfolio?

FNDF and IXN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDF or IXN?

IXN has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to FNDF (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs IXN's -55.67%.

Which ETF is better, FNDF or IXN?

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 24.76% vs 11.78% for FNDF. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDF or IXN?

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 24.76% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDF or IXN?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDF or IXN?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.79% for IXN.

What is the main difference between FNDF and IXN?

FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IXN is Technology Equities. FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.46% for IXN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.