FNDF vs. FRDM
FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) and FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while FRDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDF returned 13.11%/yr vs 18.68%/yr for FRDM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FRDM.
Performance
FNDF vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 40.13% return.
FNDF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
FRDM
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 40.13%
- 6M
- 46.37%
- 1Y
- 87.32%
- 3Y*
- 34.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 19.66% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 10.32% |
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 40.13% | 61.27% | 1.70% | 22.77% | -14.45% | 6.13% | 16.90% | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and FRDM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FNDF and FRDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
FRDM
FNDF vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDF | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.54 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 5.02 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | 19.36 | -5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FRDM drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and FRDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -40.49% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -16.87% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -16.87% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -29.25% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -4.36% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -7.09% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 4.37% | -1.53% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is 6.65%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that FNDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 14.27% | -7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 24.39% | -10.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 26.86% | -10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 21.35% | -5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 23.09% | -5.38% |
FNDF vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDF vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than FRDM's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.87% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 1.56% | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 1.11% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDF and FRDM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRDM has higher volatility (14.27%) compared to FNDF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs FRDM's -40.49%.
On 5-year performance, FRDM leads with 18.68% vs 13.11% for FNDF. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 18.68% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.
FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.56% for FRDM.
FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FRDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Freedom Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.49% for FRDM.
FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDF and FRDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer