FNDE vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDE returned 9.98%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for SCHG. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FNDE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

FNDE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.98%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.56% annualized return.

FNDE

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.81%
• 6M: 7.39%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 1Y: 29.79%
• 3Y*: 20.36%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: 9.98%
• ALL TIME*: 7.27%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 4.10%
• 6M: 13.23%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: 24.14%
• 5Y*: 13.74%
• 10Y*: 18.56%
• ALL TIME*: 16.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$31.25M	$31.29M	$33.84M
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$253.95M	$251.67M	$339.26M

FNDE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	16.21%	29.46%	12.10%	14.99%	-15.58%	14.41%	-2.77%	19.75%	-10.37%	26.77%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	9.14%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and SCHG is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.59

The correlation between FNDE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDE vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDE	SCHG
Financial Services	25.0%	7.7%
Technology	22.3%	44.0%
Energy	13.2%	0.9%
Basic Materials	12.0%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	11.2%
Communication Services	6.6%	14.1%
Industrials	4.6%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	1.9%
Utilities	2.4%	0.5%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.6%
Healthcare	0.4%	9.9%

Return for Risk

FNDE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDE

FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 71
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDE	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.12	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	1.59	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.20	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	1.13	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.25	3.57	+5.69

FNDE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDE	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.55%	-34.59%	-8.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-16.41%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.40%	-23.39%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	-34.59%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.93%	-34.59%	-5.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	0.00%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-5.19%	-6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	5.19%	-1.96%

Volatility

FNDE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) is 4.18%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that FNDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDE	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	4.97%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	13.15%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	16.72%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	22.46%	-5.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	21.61%	-2.48%

FNDE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	3.56%	4.19%	4.82%	4.74%	5.59%	4.32%	2.50%	3.47%	2.98%	2.05%	1.65%	2.02%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDE and SCHG in my portfolio?

FNDE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDE or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to FNDE (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, FNDE or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.56% vs 9.98% for FNDE. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDE or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDE or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDE or SCHG?

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between FNDE and SCHG?

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.