PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDE having a 11.30% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 11.18%.


FNDE

1D
0.78%
1M
1.70%
YTD
14.42%
6M
15.32%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
11.30%

SCHF

1D
0.21%
1M
3.82%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.27%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
14.42%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
17.68%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and SCHF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.79

The correlation between FNDE and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
SCHF

Technology

22.3%
17.6%

Financial Services

16.8%
23.3%

Energy

10.6%
4.7%

Basic Materials

8.0%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
7.3%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.6%

Industrials

3.5%
18.1%

Utilities

1.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
5.7%

Healthcare

1.1%
7.0%

Technology

FNDE
22.3%
SCHF
17.6%

Financial Services

FNDE
16.8%
SCHF
23.3%

Energy

FNDE
10.6%
SCHF
4.7%

Basic Materials

FNDE
8.0%
SCHF
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
7.9%
SCHF
7.3%

Communication Services

FNDE
3.6%
SCHF
3.6%

Industrials

FNDE
3.5%
SCHF
18.1%

Utilities

FNDE
1.9%
SCHF
3.2%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
SCHF
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
1.2%
SCHF
5.7%

Healthcare

FNDE
1.1%
SCHF
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDESCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.18

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

12.22

-0.22

FNDE vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDESCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-34.87%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-11.48%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-13.41%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-29.14%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-34.87%

-5.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

0.00%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-7.36%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.98%

-0.15%

Volatility

FNDE vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 6.12% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDESCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

6.42%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

14.43%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

16.63%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.55%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.28%

17.21%

+2.07%

FNDE vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than SCHF's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.66%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.90%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and SCHF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to FNDE (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 11.30% vs 11.18% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 2.90% for SCHF.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer