PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 35.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed PIE with an annualized return of 9.98%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
0.92%
1M
5.81%
6M
7.39%
YTD
16.21%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
9.98%
ALL TIME*
7.27%

PIE

1D
4.40%
1M
-2.09%
6M
23.78%
YTD
35.33%
1Y
50.41%
3Y*
20.74%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.25M$31.29M$33.84M
$1.82M$3.98M$2.82M

FNDE vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
16.21%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
35.33%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and PIE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.80

The correlation between FNDE and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
PIE

Financial Services

25.0%
14.6%

Technology

22.3%
52.7%

Energy

13.2%
3.7%

Basic Materials

12.0%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
1.5%

Communication Services

6.6%
1.3%

Industrials

4.6%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
0.2%

Utilities

2.4%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
3.5%

Healthcare

0.4%
3.2%

Financial Services

FNDE
25.0%
PIE
14.6%

Technology

FNDE
22.3%
PIE
52.7%

Energy

FNDE
13.2%
PIE
3.7%

Basic Materials

FNDE
12.0%
PIE
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
8.9%
PIE
1.5%

Communication Services

FNDE
6.6%
PIE
1.3%

Industrials

FNDE
4.6%
PIE
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
3.3%
PIE
0.2%

Utilities

FNDE
2.4%
PIE
1.2%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.4%
PIE
3.5%

Healthcare

FNDE
0.4%
PIE
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDE vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.94

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

11.59

-2.34

FNDE vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-72.98%

+29.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-17.26%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-28.69%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-36.78%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-40.32%

+0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-7.42%

+6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-25.90%

+14.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

4.36%

-1.13%

Volatility

FNDE vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) is 4.18%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that FNDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

12.86%

-8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

24.32%

-10.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

27.48%

-11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

21.44%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

21.92%

-2.79%

FNDE vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than PIE's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.56%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.79%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and PIE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to FNDE (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 9.98% vs 9.25% for PIE. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 9.98% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.79% for PIE.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.90% for PIE.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer