FNDE vs. FNDC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF) and FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index, while FNDC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDE returned 10.89%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for FNDC. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

FNDE vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than FNDC's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed FNDC with an annualized return of 10.89%, while FNDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.

FNDE

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -3.22%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 12.71%
• 1Y: 30.40%
• 3Y*: 19.28%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

FNDC

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -4.11%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 23.62%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF	11.54%	29.46%	12.10%	14.99%	-15.58%	14.41%	-2.77%	19.75%	-10.37%	26.77%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	9.07%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and FNDC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.76

The correlation between FNDE and FNDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDE	FNDC
Financial Services	23.8%	11.5%
Technology	18.7%	8.7%
Energy	15.5%	4.6%
Basic Materials	13.6%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	12.8%
Communication Services	6.6%	4.8%
Industrials	4.7%	25.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	6.3%
Utilities	2.5%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.5%	6.9%
Healthcare	0.5%	4.9%

Return for Risk

FNDE vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE

FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 66
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 51
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDE	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.63	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.30	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	2.12	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.12	7.87	+3.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDE vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and FNDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDE	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	1.63	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.43	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.51	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.48	-0.13

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and FNDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDE	FNDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.55%	-43.22%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-11.20%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.40%	-12.98%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	-32.13%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.93%	-43.22%	+3.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.03%	-4.11%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.70%	-8.44%	-3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	3.01%	-0.27%

Volatility

FNDE vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) at 4.98%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDE	FNDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	4.98%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	12.15%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.47%	14.55%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	16.03%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	16.83%	+2.49%

FNDE vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNDE and FNDC have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

FNDE vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than FNDC's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.54%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF	3.75%	4.19%	4.82%	4.74%	5.59%	4.32%	2.50%	3.47%	2.98%	2.05%	1.65%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDE and FNDC in my portfolio?

FNDE and FNDC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDE or FNDC?

FNDE has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to FNDC (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs FNDC's -43.22%.

Which ETF is better, FNDE or FNDC?

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 10.89% vs 8.59% for FNDC. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, FNDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDE or FNDC?

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 10.89% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDE or FNDC?

FNDE and FNDC have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDE or FNDC?

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 3.54% for FNDC.

What is the main difference between FNDE and FNDC?

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FNDC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. FNDE tracks Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index, while FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.