PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. FNDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 18.31% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: FNDE at 11.35% and FNDA at 11.35%.


FNDE

1D
0.66%
1M
2.02%
YTD
13.70%
6M
15.79%
1Y
31.37%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.35%

FNDA

1D
0.95%
1M
6.65%
YTD
18.31%
6M
15.70%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
13.70%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
18.31%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and FNDA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.61

The correlation between FNDE and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
FNDA

Technology

23.3%
16.2%

Financial Services

16.2%
14.1%

Energy

10.4%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
12.2%

Basic Materials

8.1%
5.2%

Industrials

3.6%
19.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
4.0%

Utilities

1.9%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
3.9%

Healthcare

1.1%
7.1%

Technology

FNDE
23.3%
FNDA
16.2%

Financial Services

FNDE
16.2%
FNDA
14.1%

Energy

FNDE
10.4%
FNDA
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
8.1%
FNDA
12.2%

Basic Materials

FNDE
8.1%
FNDA
5.2%

Industrials

FNDE
3.6%
FNDA
19.3%

Communication Services

FNDE
3.5%
FNDA
4.0%

Utilities

FNDE
1.9%
FNDA
2.7%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
FNDA
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
1.2%
FNDA
3.9%

Healthcare

FNDE
1.1%
FNDA
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEFNDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.54

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

11.47

-0.80

FNDE vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and FNDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEFNDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-44.64%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-9.36%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-25.92%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-25.92%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-44.64%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

0.00%

-3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-6.68%

-5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.89%

-0.09%

Volatility

FNDE vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) at 5.14%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEFNDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

5.14%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

12.13%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

17.40%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

20.93%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

22.39%

-3.09%

FNDE vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than FNDA's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.06%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.68%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and FNDA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDE has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to FNDA (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

On 10-year performance, FNDA leads with 11.35% vs 11.35% for FNDE. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.06% for FNDA.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FNDA is Small Cap Blend Equities. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and FNDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer