PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDC vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDC vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 9.07%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.


FNDC

1D
-2.22%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.23%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.07%

YCS

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
8.64%35.65%1.38%14.92%-14.71%10.26%6.58%20.58%-19.10%29.22%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.63%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and YCS is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FNDC and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.45, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDC vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC
FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDCYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.78

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.47

11.93

-4.46

FNDC vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDCYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.22%

-49.56%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-8.30%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.98%

-23.05%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.13%

-27.32%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

-27.32%

-15.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-0.14%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-19.87%

+11.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.65%

+0.41%

Volatility

FNDC vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that FNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDCYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

2.25%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

12.19%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

16.93%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

21.10%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.69%

18.82%

-2.13%

FNDC vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDC vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
3.55%3.86%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.95%1.30%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDC and YCS have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDC has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.62% vs 9.07% for FNDC. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

FNDC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDC and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer