PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDC vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDC vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.51% return.


FNDC

1D
0.69%
1M
1.39%
6M
5.12%
YTD
11.89%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
8.65%
ALL TIME*
7.87%

WNTR

1D
-0.22%
1M
7.89%
6M
8.31%
YTD
10.51%
1Y
106.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.68M$3.93M$9.60M
$3.92M$3.66M$3.95M

FNDC vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and WNTR is -0.39, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDC vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDC
FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDC vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDCWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.52

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

6.38

+0.76

FNDC vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, roughly equal to the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDCWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.22%

-42.65%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-42.65%

+31.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-9.84%

+8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-20.15%

+11.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

16.83%

-13.60%

Volatility

FNDC vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC) is 4.23%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that FNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDCWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

13.00%

-8.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

47.22%

-34.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

54.66%

-39.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

53.34%

-37.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

53.34%

-36.66%

FNDC vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDC vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than WNTR's 107.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
3.64%3.86%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.95%1.30%
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
107.26%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDC and WNTR have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to FNDC (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.92% vs 22.97% for FNDC. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.92% return vs 22.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.26%, compared with 3.64% for FNDC.

FNDC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDC and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer