FNDC vs. FDGRX

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) and FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) are both funds - FNDC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US, while FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FNDC is passively managed, while FDGRX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDC returned 9.07%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for FDGRX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FDGRX.

Performance

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 22.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.23% annualized return.

FNDC

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 13.40%
• 1Y: 26.82%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

FDGRX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 22.31%
• 6M: 20.57%
• 1Y: 46.04%
• 3Y*: 29.83%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: 23.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	11.54%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	22.31%	18.54%	37.18%	47.25%	-33.86%	22.57%	67.42%	38.40%	-4.14%	36.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and FDGRX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.65

The correlation between FNDC and FDGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDC	FDGRX
Industrials	25.3%	2.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	11.5%
Financial Services	11.4%	3.0%
Basic Materials	11.3%	0.6%
Technology	10.1%	53.5%
Real Estate	6.6%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	2.6%
Healthcare	4.8%	11.3%
Communication Services	4.7%	14.1%
Energy	4.1%	0.5%
Utilities	2.6%	-

Return for Risk

FNDC vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FDGRX

FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDC	FDGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.34	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.90	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	3.60	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	13.24	-4.38

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and FDGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and FDGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDC	FDGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-71.62%	+28.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-12.60%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	-26.19%	+13.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.13%	-40.25%	+8.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	-40.25%	-2.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-1.17%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-15.89%	+7.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	3.42%	-0.38%

Volatility

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) is 5.27%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that FNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDC	FDGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	7.29%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.54%	15.82%	-3.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	19.47%	-4.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	24.09%	-8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	23.47%	-6.64%

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDC vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.86%	3.83%	7.20%	10.67%	8.86%	3.84%	6.38%	4.73%	6.16%	3.92%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.46%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDC and FDGRX in my portfolio?

FNDC and FDGRX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDC or FDGRX?

FDGRX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to FNDC (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.