PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGRX vs. FOCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a 23.00% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 29.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDGRX having a 23.19% annualized return and FOCPX not far behind at 23.16%.


FDGRX

1D
1.85%
1M
2.21%
YTD
23.00%
6M
16.48%
1Y
47.42%
3Y*
30.07%
5Y*
16.39%
10Y*
23.19%

FOCPX

1D
2.04%
1M
5.89%
YTD
29.53%
6M
29.90%
1Y
60.78%
3Y*
34.57%
5Y*
18.97%
10Y*
23.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
23.00%18.54%37.18%47.25%-33.86%22.57%67.42%38.40%-4.14%36.76%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
29.53%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGRX and FOCPX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1984

0.94

The correlation between FDGRX and FOCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGRX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGRX
FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGRXFOCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.53

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

5.36

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

22.70

-8.99

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FOCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGRX and FOCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and FOCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGRXFOCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.62%

-70.25%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-11.29%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

-24.82%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-37.05%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.25%

-37.05%

-3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.06%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-16.99%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.66%

+0.76%

Volatility

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) is 7.50%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that FDGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGRXFOCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

8.83%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.80%

15.82%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.54%

19.37%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.10%

22.92%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.47%

22.56%

+0.91%

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGRX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCPX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGRX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison

FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FOCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%8.86%3.83%7.20%10.67%8.86%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.16%3.92%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.00%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FDGRX and FOCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCPX has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to FDGRX (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGRX dropped -71.62% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGRX and FOCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer