PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDA vs. XSHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDA vs. XSHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 20.31% return, which is significantly higher than XSHD's 16.35% return.


FNDA

1D
0.94%
1M
2.32%
6M
13.64%
YTD
20.31%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
10.50%

XSHD

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.28%
6M
9.90%
YTD
16.35%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
-2.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. XSHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
20.31%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%
XSHD
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
16.35%-6.41%-5.25%3.00%-19.48%18.31%-13.55%17.91%-7.86%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and XSHD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.85

The correlation between FNDA and XSHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDA vs. XSHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDA
XSHD

Industrials

19.1%
12.3%

Technology

15.2%

-

Financial Services

14.8%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
3.8%

Real Estate

10.0%
41.6%

Healthcare

7.8%
0.6%

Energy

5.6%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.3%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.4%

Utilities

3.0%
12.3%

Industrials

FNDA
19.1%
XSHD
12.3%

Technology

FNDA
15.2%
XSHD

-

Financial Services

FNDA
14.8%
XSHD
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDA
12.4%
XSHD
3.8%

Real Estate

FNDA
10.0%
XSHD
41.6%

Healthcare

FNDA
7.8%
XSHD
0.6%

Energy

FNDA
5.6%
XSHD
7.7%

Basic Materials

FNDA
4.3%
XSHD
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

FNDA
3.9%
XSHD
11.9%

Communication Services

FNDA
3.7%
XSHD
2.4%

Utilities

FNDA
3.0%
XSHD
12.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDA vs. XSHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

XSHD
XSHD Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XSHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. XSHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDAXSHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

1.34

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.34

3.65

+6.70

FNDA vs. XSHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the XSHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and XSHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. XSHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum XSHD drawdown of -49.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and XSHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDAXSHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-49.53%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-10.51%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-20.77%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-34.67%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-18.97%

+18.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-16.43%

+9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.86%

-0.96%

Volatility

FNDA vs. XSHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA) is 3.34%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDAXSHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

5.13%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

10.41%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

15.06%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

18.82%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

22.17%

+0.15%

FNDA vs. XSHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XSHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDA vs. XSHD - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than XSHD's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
1.10%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
XSHD
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.82%6.45%7.25%7.62%6.77%3.86%5.55%4.88%5.49%4.11%0.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDA and XSHD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSHD has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FNDA (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs XSHD's -49.53%.

On 5-year performance, FNDA leads with 9.27% vs -2.42% for XSHD. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 9.27% return vs -2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XSHD.

XSHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 1.10% for FNDA.

FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XSHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. FNDA tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity U.S. Small Index, while XSHD tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.30% for XSHD.

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDA and XSHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer