FNDA vs. SDVY
FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and SDVY (First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - FNDA tracks the Russell RAFI Small Company US while SDVY tracks the NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDA returned 7.06%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for SDVY. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SDVY.
Performance
FNDA vs. SDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly higher than SDVY's 7.70% return.
FNDA
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
SDVY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDA vs. SDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 14.87% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 31.12% | 8.44% | 24.34% | -12.12% | 4.45% |
SDVY First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 7.70% | 8.83% | 11.19% | 28.58% | -11.98% | 29.13% | 11.72% | 25.62% | -15.26% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and SDVY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FNDA and SDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDA vs. SDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDA
SDVY
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
FNDA
SDVY
Technology
FNDA
SDVY
Financial Services
FNDA
SDVY
Consumer Cyclical
FNDA
SDVY
Real Estate
FNDA
SDVY
-
Healthcare
FNDA
SDVY
Energy
FNDA
SDVY
Basic Materials
FNDA
SDVY
Consumer Defensive
FNDA
SDVY
Communication Services
FNDA
SDVY
Utilities
FNDA
SDVY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. SDVY — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
SDVY
FNDA vs. SDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDA | SDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 2.17 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 7.49 | +3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDA | SDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.32 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.40 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.43 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. SDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, roughly equal to the maximum SDVY drawdown of -44.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and SDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | SDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -44.70% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.28% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | -25.92% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | -25.92% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -3.08% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -7.71% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.69% | +0.20% |
Volatility
FNDA vs. SDVY - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) at 4.14%. This indicates that FNDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | SDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 4.14% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 10.89% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 15.34% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 21.04% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 24.82% | -2.45% |
FNDA vs. SDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SDVY's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDA vs. SDVY - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than SDVY's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
SDVY First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.28% | 1.09% | 1.48% | 1.69% | 1.57% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FNDA and SDVY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNDA has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to SDVY (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs SDVY's -44.70%.
On 5-year performance, SDVY leads with 8.43% vs 7.06% for FNDA. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SDVY has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDVY has performed better with a 8.43% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDVY.
SDVY has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.
FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while SDVY tracks NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.60% for SDVY.
FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDA and SDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer