PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDVY vs. RFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDVY vs. RFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDVY achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than RFV's 12.44% return.


SDVY

1D
0.31%
1M
1.95%
YTD
10.79%
6M
8.00%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*

RFV

1D
0.15%
1M
3.08%
YTD
12.44%
6M
10.55%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDVY vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDVY
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
10.79%8.83%11.19%28.58%-11.98%29.13%11.72%25.62%-15.26%5.62%
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
12.44%7.66%5.63%30.26%-3.99%33.02%9.61%24.98%-18.56%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SDVY and RFV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2017

0.86

The correlation between SDVY and RFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDVY vs. RFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDVY
RFV

Financial Services

33.3%
17.4%

Industrials

29.3%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
25.5%

Technology

8.6%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
7.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%
7.6%

Healthcare

3.4%
0.6%

Energy

2.9%
12.1%

Communication Services

2.3%

-

Real Estate

0.6%
3.5%

Utilities

0.6%

-

Financial Services

SDVY
33.3%
RFV
17.4%

Industrials

SDVY
29.3%
RFV
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SDVY
8.6%
RFV
25.5%

Technology

SDVY
8.6%
RFV
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

SDVY
5.2%
RFV
7.4%

Basic Materials

SDVY
4.6%
RFV
7.6%

Healthcare

SDVY
3.4%
RFV
0.6%

Energy

SDVY
2.9%
RFV
12.1%

Communication Services

SDVY
2.3%
RFV

-

Real Estate

SDVY
0.6%
RFV
3.5%

Utilities

SDVY
0.6%
RFV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDVY vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDVY
SDVY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

RFV
RFV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDVY vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDVYRFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.79

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

5.27

+3.94

SDVY vs. RFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDVY Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the RFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDVY and RFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDVY vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDVY drawdown since its inception was -44.70%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVY and RFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDVYRFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.70%

-71.82%

+27.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-12.51%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-24.65%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-24.65%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-2.61%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-9.77%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

4.24%

-1.54%

Volatility

SDVY vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) is 3.71%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that SDVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDVYRFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

4.26%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

11.90%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

18.05%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

21.98%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

24.99%

-0.22%

SDVY vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDVY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDVY vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison

SDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than RFV's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
2.24%2.07%1.31%1.27%2.05%1.60%1.52%1.71%1.39%1.36%0.88%1.79%
SDVY
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
1.17%1.69%1.60%1.90%2.28%1.09%1.48%1.69%1.57%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDVY and RFV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFV has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to SDVY (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVY dropped -44.70% vs RFV's -71.82%.

On 5-year performance, RFV leads with 11.17% vs 10.04% for SDVY. On fees, RFV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFV has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDVY.

RFV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.17% for SDVY.

SDVY is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RFV is Small Cap Value Equities. SDVY tracks NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index, while RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SDVY and 0.35% for RFV.

SDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDVY and RFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer