SDVY vs. RFV
SDVY (First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) and RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDVY is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index, while RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDVY returned 10.04%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for RFV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDVY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RFV.
Performance
SDVY vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDVY achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than RFV's 12.44% return.
SDVY
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- —
RFV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
SDVY vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDVY First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 10.79% | 8.83% | 11.19% | 28.58% | -11.98% | 29.13% | 11.72% | 25.62% | -15.26% | 5.62% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 12.44% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDVY and RFV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SDVY and RFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDVY vs. RFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDVY
RFV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SDVY
RFV
Industrials
SDVY
RFV
Consumer Cyclical
SDVY
RFV
Technology
SDVY
RFV
Consumer Defensive
SDVY
RFV
Basic Materials
SDVY
RFV
Healthcare
SDVY
RFV
Energy
SDVY
RFV
Communication Services
SDVY
RFV
-
Real Estate
SDVY
RFV
Utilities
SDVY
RFV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDVY vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank
SDVY
RFV
SDVY vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDVY | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.79 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 5.27 | +3.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDVY vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDVY drawdown since its inception was -44.70%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVY and RFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDVY | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.70% | -71.82% | +27.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -12.51% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | -24.65% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | -24.65% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -2.61% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -9.77% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 4.24% | -1.54% |
Volatility
SDVY vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) is 3.71%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that SDVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDVY | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 4.26% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 11.90% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 18.05% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 21.98% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 24.99% | -0.22% |
SDVY vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDVY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDVY vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
SDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than RFV's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.24% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
SDVY First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 1.17% | 1.69% | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.28% | 1.09% | 1.48% | 1.69% | 1.57% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDVY and RFV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFV has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to SDVY (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVY dropped -44.70% vs RFV's -71.82%.
On 5-year performance, RFV leads with 11.17% vs 10.04% for SDVY. On fees, RFV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RFV has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDVY.
RFV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.17% for SDVY.
SDVY is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RFV is Small Cap Value Equities. SDVY tracks NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index, while RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SDVY and 0.35% for RFV.
SDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDVY and RFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer