PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDA vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDA vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 8.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 11.40%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.


FNDA

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.11%
YTD
17.04%
6M
15.17%
1Y
31.82%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
11.40%

SCHB

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
8.88%
6M
7.77%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
17.04%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
8.88%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and SCHB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.86

The correlation between FNDA and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDA vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDA
SCHB

Industrials

19.3%
9.1%

Technology

16.2%
37.3%

Financial Services

14.1%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
9.8%

Real Estate

9.8%
2.3%

Healthcare

7.1%
8.8%

Energy

5.5%
3.3%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.3%

Utilities

2.7%
2.1%

Industrials

FNDA
19.3%
SCHB
9.1%

Technology

FNDA
16.2%
SCHB
37.3%

Financial Services

FNDA
14.1%
SCHB
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDA
12.2%
SCHB
9.8%

Real Estate

FNDA
9.8%
SCHB
2.3%

Healthcare

FNDA
7.1%
SCHB
8.8%

Energy

FNDA
5.5%
SCHB
3.3%

Basic Materials

FNDA
5.2%
SCHB
1.9%

Communication Services

FNDA
4.0%
SCHB
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

FNDA
3.9%
SCHB
4.3%

Utilities

FNDA
2.7%
SCHB
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDA vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDASCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.72

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

12.04

-1.00

FNDA vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDASCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-35.27%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.91%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-19.34%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-25.41%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

-35.27%

-9.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-2.86%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-4.11%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.01%

+0.88%

Volatility

FNDA vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 4.97% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDASCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

5.00%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

10.09%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

12.83%

+4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.89%

17.35%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

18.34%

+4.02%

FNDA vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDA vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than SCHB's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.07%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDA and SCHB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FNDA (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.12% vs 11.40% for FNDA. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.

FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDA and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer