FNDA vs. FYX
FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - FNDA tracks the Russell RAFI Small Company US while FYX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDA returned 11.40%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for FYX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FYX.
Performance
FNDA vs. FYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 22.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has underperformed FYX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while FYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.
FNDA
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 17.04%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 31.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
FYX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 22.94%
- 6M
- 20.86%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
FNDA vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 17.04% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 31.12% | 8.44% | 24.34% | -12.12% | 12.68% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 22.94% | 12.68% | 12.22% | 18.30% | -18.41% | 27.43% | 19.48% | 21.32% | -10.64% | 14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and FYX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FNDA and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDA vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDA
FYX
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
FNDA
FYX
Technology
FNDA
FYX
Financial Services
FNDA
FYX
Consumer Cyclical
FNDA
FYX
Real Estate
FNDA
FYX
Healthcare
FNDA
FYX
Energy
FNDA
FYX
Basic Materials
FNDA
FYX
Communication Services
FNDA
FYX
Consumer Defensive
FNDA
FYX
Utilities
FNDA
FYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
FYX
FNDA vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDA | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 6.27 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.04 | 20.40 | -9.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and FYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -61.80% | +17.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -7.56% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | -27.91% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | -27.91% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | -48.82% | +4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.12% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -10.86% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.32% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FNDA vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) have volatilities of 4.97% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 4.89% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 12.29% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 18.42% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 21.96% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 24.20% | -1.84% |
FNDA vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDA vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than FYX's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.07% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.67% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FNDA and FYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNDA has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to FYX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs FYX's -61.80%.
On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 13.06% vs 11.40% for FNDA. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.67% for FYX.
FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.63% for FYX.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDA and FYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer