PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDA vs. EWZS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDA vs. EWZS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly higher than EWZS's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has outperformed EWZS with an annualized return of 10.87%, while EWZS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.


FNDA

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.29%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.27%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
10.87%

EWZS

1D
-4.37%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
4.95%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. EWZS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
14.87%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
4.95%45.18%-35.95%32.65%-11.20%-14.09%-20.86%50.60%-7.13%54.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and EWZS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.43

FNDA vs. EWZS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDA
EWZS

Industrials

18.9%
8.6%

Technology

14.9%
3.0%

Financial Services

14.6%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
15.5%

Real Estate

9.9%
13.4%

Healthcare

6.8%
4.8%

Energy

6.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

5.2%
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
10.9%

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Utilities

2.8%
12.1%

Industrials

FNDA
18.9%
EWZS
8.6%

Technology

FNDA
14.9%
EWZS
3.0%

Financial Services

FNDA
14.6%
EWZS
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDA
12.2%
EWZS
15.5%

Real Estate

FNDA
9.9%
EWZS
13.4%

Healthcare

FNDA
6.8%
EWZS
4.8%

Energy

FNDA
6.2%
EWZS
4.8%

Basic Materials

FNDA
5.2%
EWZS
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

FNDA
4.2%
EWZS
10.9%

Communication Services

FNDA
4.1%
EWZS

-

Utilities

FNDA
2.8%
EWZS
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDA vs. EWZS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EWZS
EWZS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EWZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. EWZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDAEWZSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.07

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

0.50

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

1.24

+9.49

FNDA vs. EWZS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the EWZS Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and EWZS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDAEWZSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

0.28

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

-0.13

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.21

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

-0.03

+0.52

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. EWZS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum EWZS drawdown of -79.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and EWZS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDAEWZSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-79.23%

+34.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-17.05%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-37.55%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-48.78%

+22.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

-63.15%

+18.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-30.99%

+29.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-36.57%

+29.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

6.79%

-3.90%

Volatility

FNDA vs. EWZS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) is 4.38%, while iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDAEWZSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

11.03%

-6.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

25.56%

-13.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

30.44%

-13.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.89%

33.12%

-12.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

36.79%

-14.42%

FNDA vs. EWZS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EWZS's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDA vs. EWZS - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than EWZS's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.69%3.88%4.93%2.75%4.61%4.51%1.15%1.77%4.35%3.41%3.62%4.35%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.09%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDA and EWZS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZS has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to FNDA (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs EWZS's -79.23%.

On 10-year performance, FNDA leads with 10.87% vs 7.86% for EWZS. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZS.

EWZS has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.

FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EWZS is Latin America Equities. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while EWZS tracks MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.59% for EWZS.

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDA and EWZS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer