FNDA vs. EWZS
FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and EWZS (iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company US, while EWZS is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDA returned 10.87%/yr vs 7.86%/yr for EWZS. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWZS.
Performance
FNDA vs. EWZS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly higher than EWZS's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has outperformed EWZS with an annualized return of 10.87%, while EWZS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.
FNDA
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
EWZS
- 1D
- -4.37%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.41%
- 5Y*
- -4.16%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
FNDA vs. EWZS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 14.87% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 31.12% | 8.44% | 24.34% | -12.12% | 12.68% |
EWZS iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 4.95% | 45.18% | -35.95% | 32.65% | -11.20% | -14.09% | -20.86% | 50.60% | -7.13% | 54.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and EWZS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013 | 0.43 |
FNDA vs. EWZS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDA
EWZS
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Industrials
FNDA
EWZS
Technology
FNDA
EWZS
Financial Services
FNDA
EWZS
Consumer Cyclical
FNDA
EWZS
Real Estate
FNDA
EWZS
Healthcare
FNDA
EWZS
Energy
FNDA
EWZS
Basic Materials
FNDA
EWZS
Consumer Defensive
FNDA
EWZS
Communication Services
FNDA
EWZS
-
Utilities
FNDA
EWZS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. EWZS — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
EWZS
FNDA vs. EWZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDA | EWZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.07 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 0.50 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 1.24 | +9.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDA | EWZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 0.28 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | -0.13 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.21 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | -0.03 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. EWZS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum EWZS drawdown of -79.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and EWZS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | EWZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -79.23% | +34.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -17.05% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | -37.55% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | -48.78% | +22.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | -63.15% | +18.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -30.99% | +29.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -36.57% | +29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 6.79% | -3.90% |
Volatility
FNDA vs. EWZS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) is 4.38%, while iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | EWZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 11.03% | -6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 25.56% | -13.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 30.44% | -13.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 33.12% | -12.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 36.79% | -14.42% |
FNDA vs. EWZS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EWZS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDA vs. EWZS - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than EWZS's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZS iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 3.69% | 3.88% | 4.93% | 2.75% | 4.61% | 4.51% | 1.15% | 1.77% | 4.35% | 3.41% | 3.62% | 4.35% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDA and EWZS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWZS has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to FNDA (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs EWZS's -79.23%.
On 10-year performance, FNDA leads with 10.87% vs 7.86% for EWZS. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZS.
EWZS has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.
FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EWZS is Latin America Equities. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while EWZS tracks MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.59% for EWZS.
FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDA and EWZS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer