PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZS vs. ECH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZS vs. ECH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZS achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly higher than ECH's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZS has outperformed ECH with an annualized return of 8.34%, while ECH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.


EWZS

1D
1.57%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
9.74%
6M
2.03%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
8.34%

ECH

1D
-1.12%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
0.47%
6M
6.38%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
4.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZS vs. ECH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
9.74%45.18%-35.95%32.65%-11.20%-14.09%-20.86%50.60%-7.13%54.18%
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
0.47%65.41%-8.67%9.01%25.12%-19.80%-7.13%-17.79%-18.98%41.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZS and ECH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.53

The correlation between EWZS and ECH shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (5 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWZS vs. ECH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWZS
ECH

Basic Materials

16.5%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.5%
10.7%

Real Estate

13.4%
9.2%

Utilities

12.1%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
6.3%

Financial Services

10.4%
24.6%

Industrials

8.6%
14.4%

Energy

4.8%

-

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Technology

3.0%

-

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Basic Materials

EWZS
16.5%
ECH
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWZS
15.5%
ECH
10.7%

Real Estate

EWZS
13.4%
ECH
9.2%

Utilities

EWZS
12.1%
ECH
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

EWZS
10.9%
ECH
6.3%

Financial Services

EWZS
10.4%
ECH
24.6%

Industrials

EWZS
8.6%
ECH
14.4%

Energy

EWZS
4.8%
ECH

-

Healthcare

EWZS
4.8%
ECH

-

Technology

EWZS
3.0%
ECH

-

Communication Services

EWZS

-

ECH
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZS vs. ECH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZS
EWZS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EWZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ECH
ECH Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ECH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ECH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECH Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZS vs. ECH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWZSECHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

1.30

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

1.81

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.63

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.61

4.17

-1.56

EWZS vs. ECH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the ECH Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZS and ECH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWZSECHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.30

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.42

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.16

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.06

-0.08

Drawdowns

EWZS vs. ECH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZS drawdown since its inception was -79.23%, which is greater than ECH's maximum drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZS and ECH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZSECHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.23%

-74.08%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.05%

-19.65%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.55%

-25.59%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.78%

-26.06%

-22.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.15%

-66.89%

+3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.84%

-25.34%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.57%

-37.52%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

7.70%

-0.99%

Volatility

EWZS vs. ECH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) at 8.31%. This indicates that EWZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZSECHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.23%

8.31%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.17%

20.22%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.13%

24.79%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.07%

27.55%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.77%

27.21%

+9.56%

EWZS vs. ECH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWZS and ECH have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

EWZS vs. ECH - Dividend Comparison

EWZS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than ECH's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
2.00%2.01%3.12%4.77%6.73%5.49%2.16%2.47%2.37%1.42%1.85%2.13%
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.53%3.88%4.93%2.75%4.61%4.51%1.15%1.77%4.35%3.41%3.62%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZS and ECH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZS has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to ECH (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZS dropped -79.23% vs ECH's -74.08%.

On 10-year performance, EWZS leads with 8.34% vs 4.42% for ECH. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, ECH has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWZS has performed better with a 8.34% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWZS and ECH have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

EWZS has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.00% for ECH.

EWZS is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ECH is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWZS tracks MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index, while ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index.

ECH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZS and ECH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer