PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FNDA vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FNDA vs. DBE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company US, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDA returned 10.86%/yr vs 11.58%/yr for DBE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.

Performance

FNDA vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has underperformed DBE with an annualized return of 10.86%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.

FNDA

1D
1.00%
1M
1.84%
YTD
16.02%
6M
15.51%
1Y
32.64%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
10.86%

DBE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
79.04%
6M
69.31%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF		16.02%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund		79.04%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and DBE is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.25

The correlation between FNDA and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF

Invesco DB Energy Fund

Often compared with FNDA:
FNDA vs. SCHAFNDA vs. FNDCFNDA vs. VBKFNDA vs. IFRAFNDA vs. SPYFNDA vs. IGFFNDA vs. LRGF
Often compared with DBE:
DBE vs. DBBDBE vs. XLEDBE vs. VDEDBE vs. XLKDBE vs. COMTDBE vs. GLDDBE vs. TIP

Return for Risk

FNDA vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FNDADBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.92
2.33

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.75
2.87

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

5.67

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

11.08

+0.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDA vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FNDADBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.33

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.65

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.41

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.09

+0.40

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and DBE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FNDADBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-86.69%

+42.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-14.41%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-23.89%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-38.74%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

-60.84%

+16.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-32.03%

+32.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-57.30%

+50.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

7.37%

-4.48%

Volatility

FNDA vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) is 4.26%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FNDADBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

13.05%

-8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

30.97%

-19.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

35.07%

-17.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

29.41%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

28.34%

-5.97%

FNDA vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDA vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than DBE's 2.16% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund		2.16%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF		1.08%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

FNDA and DBE have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to FNDA (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 11.58% vs 10.86% for FNDA. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.08% for FNDA.

FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDA and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer