FNDA vs. CVSM
FNDA (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FNDA is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
FNDA vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FNDA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 30.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.34%
CVSM
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.53K | $49.87K | $42.10K | |
| $15.42M | $15.07M | $42.17M |
FNDA vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | 6.80% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and CVSM is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNDA vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDA | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and CVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -3.36% | -41.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -2.33% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -0.96% | -5.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | — | — |
Volatility
FNDA vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 11.65% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 11.65% | +9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 11.65% | +10.66% |
FNDA vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDA vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDA and CVSM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for FNDA and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer