CVSM vs. SCHA
CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. CVSM is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CVSM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
CVSM vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CVSM
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 30.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.96K | $58.28K | $38.43K | |
| $88.72M | $84.23M | $77.97M |
CVSM vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 5.73% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 4.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVSM and SCHA is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVSM vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHA
CVSM vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVSM vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVSM drawdown since its inception was -3.36%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSM and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -42.41% | +39.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.26% | +6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.94% | -7.54% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility
CVSM vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 19.03% | -7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.20% | 22.02% | -10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.20% | 22.75% | -11.55% |
CVSM vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVSM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVSM vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
CVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than SCHA's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.06% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVSM and SCHA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: CresAlta and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CVSM and 0.04% for SCHA.
Find the right allocation for CVSM and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer