FNDA vs. ASCE
FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FNDA is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.
Performance
FNDA vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.
FNDA
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
ASCE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 22.25%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDA vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 14.87% | 7.51% |
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 22.25% | 8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and ASCE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
ASCE
FNDA vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDA | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDA | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.92 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and ASCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -9.22% | -35.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.38% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -2.10% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility
FNDA vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 19.25% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 19.25% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 19.25% | +3.12% |
FNDA vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDA vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.18% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDA and ASCE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.
FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.38% for ASCE.
Find the right allocation for FNDA and ASCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer