ASCE vs. AGRW

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) and AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASCE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Allspring, while AGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ASCE returned 38.09% vs 12.89% for AGRW. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASCE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AGRW.

Performance

ASCE vs. AGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 27.72% return, which is significantly higher than AGRW's 6.82% return.

ASCE

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: 2.79%
• 6M: 22.73%
• YTD: 27.72%
• 1Y: 38.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGRW

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 6.31%
• YTD: 6.82%
• 1Y: 12.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCE vs. AGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	27.72%	8.46%
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	6.82%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and AGRW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.60

The correlation between ASCE and AGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASCE vs. AGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 79
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

AGRW

AGRW Risk / Return Rank: 24
AGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
AGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
AGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 25
AGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
AGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCE vs. AGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASCE	AGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	0.78	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	1.15	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.14	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	0.79	+3.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	2.45	+10.57

ASCE vs. AGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the AGRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASCE and AGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. AGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, smaller than the maximum AGRW drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and AGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASCE	AGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.22%	-16.46%	+7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-16.46%	+7.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	-4.11%	+1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-3.48%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	5.28%	-2.35%

Volatility

ASCE vs. AGRW - Volatility Comparison

Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) at 5.68%. This indicates that ASCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASCE	AGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	5.68%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	13.52%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.72%	16.68%	+3.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.69%	21.89%	-2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.69%	21.89%	-2.20%

ASCE vs. AGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AGRW's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASCE vs. AGRW - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than AGRW's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	0.12%	0.13%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASCE and AGRW in my portfolio?

ASCE and AGRW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASCE or AGRW?

ASCE has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to AGRW (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASCE dropped -9.22% vs AGRW's -16.46%.

Which ETF is better, ASCE or AGRW?

On 1-year performance, ASCE leads with 38.09% vs 12.89% for AGRW. On fees, AGRW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AGRW has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASCE or AGRW?

Over the 1-year period, ASCE has performed better with a 38.09% return vs 12.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASCE or AGRW?

AGRW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASCE or AGRW?

ASCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.12% for AGRW.

What is the main difference between ASCE and AGRW?

ASCE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.35% for AGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.