FNARX vs. MLOZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNARX (Fidelity Natural Resources Fund) and MLOZX (Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FNARX returned 11.13%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for MLOZX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNARX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for MLOZX.

Performance

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNARX achieves a 26.41% return, which is significantly lower than MLOZX's 36.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FNARX has outperformed MLOZX with an annualized return of 11.13%, while MLOZX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.

FNARX

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 26.41%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 49.46%
• 3Y*: 22.36%
• 5Y*: 20.77%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

MLOZX

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 36.18%
• 6M: 33.41%
• 1Y: 58.83%
• 3Y*: 25.68%
• 5Y*: 19.48%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund	26.41%	28.67%	3.76%	6.41%	41.01%	39.34%	-20.86%	19.09%	-24.28%	-0.11%
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	36.18%	17.35%	12.16%	10.49%	21.10%	39.09%	-26.70%	12.62%	-13.43%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FNARX and MLOZX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2013	0.83

The correlation between FNARX and MLOZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNARX vs. MLOZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNARX

FNARX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FNARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FNARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FNARX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FNARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FNARX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MLOZX

MLOZX Risk / Return Rank: 97
MLOZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MLOZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MLOZX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MLOZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MLOZX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNARX	MLOZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	4.27	-1.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	5.60	-1.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.73	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.80	13.16	-4.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.35	40.52	-17.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNARX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is lower than the MLOZX Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNARX and MLOZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNARX	MLOZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	4.27	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	1.07	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.44	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.29	+0.02

Drawdowns

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNARX drawdown since its inception was -71.04%, roughly equal to the maximum MLOZX drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNARX and MLOZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNARX	MLOZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.04%	-72.01%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	-4.71%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.64%	-20.84%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.93%	-20.84%	-9.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.10%	-64.94%	+0.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.04%	-0.08%	-2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-20.64%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.52%	+0.64%

Volatility

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) have volatilities of 5.16% and 5.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNARX	MLOZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	5.09%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.12%	11.23%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	14.51%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.99%	18.36%	+6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.95%	24.10%	+2.85%

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNARX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than MLOZX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNARX vs. MLOZX - Dividend Comparison

FNARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than MLOZX's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund	1.74%	1.89%	1.51%	1.60%	2.42%	1.46%	1.79%	1.42%	1.17%	1.38%	0.62%	0.78%
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	1.79%	1.71%	10.24%	4.61%	3.66%	3.08%	6.57%	6.21%	4.44%	3.86%	3.72%	6.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNARX and MLOZX in my portfolio?

FNARX and MLOZX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNARX or MLOZX?

FNARX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to MLOZX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNARX dropped -71.04% vs MLOZX's -72.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLOZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.