PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FN vs. MTSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FN vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than MTSI's 80.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed MTSI with an annualized return of 28.68%, while MTSI has yielded a comparatively lower 24.38% annualized return.


FN

1D
-2.41%
1M
-19.08%
6M
5.34%
YTD
3.48%
1Y
61.66%
3Y*
52.97%
5Y*
38.39%
10Y*
28.68%

MTSI

1D
-2.78%
1M
-17.68%
6M
76.43%
YTD
80.13%
1Y
126.52%
3Y*
68.24%
5Y*
38.76%
10Y*
24.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FN
Fabrinet
3.48%107.06%15.53%48.44%8.23%52.69%19.66%26.37%78.78%-28.78%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
80.13%31.85%39.76%47.59%-19.57%42.26%106.92%83.32%-55.41%-29.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and MTSI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012

0.50

The correlation between FN and MTSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FN:

$16.88B

MTSI:

$23.54B

EPS

FN:

$11.64

MTSI:

$2.33

PE Ratio

FN:

40.47

MTSI:

132.57

PEG Ratio

FN:

1.73

MTSI:

0.20

PS Ratio

FN:

4.02

MTSI:

21.82

PB Ratio

FN:

7.40

MTSI:

16.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

FN:

$4.24B

MTSI:

$1.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FN:

$509.75M

MTSI:

$594.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

FN:

$422.55M

MTSI:

$245.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FN vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MTSI
MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNMTSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

4.91

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

14.88

-9.47

FN vs. MTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the MTSI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and MTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FN vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, smaller than the maximum MTSI drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and MTSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNMTSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-80.78%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-25.60%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.47%

-41.09%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

-44.86%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

-80.78%

+29.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.89%

-24.69%

-12.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-26.14%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.65%

8.42%

+3.23%

Volatility

FN vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) have volatilities of 21.01% and 20.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNMTSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.01%

20.44%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.95%

44.19%

+12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.20%

53.96%

+15.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.40%

44.43%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.63%

52.53%

-3.90%

Dividends

FN vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison

Neither FN nor MTSI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FN vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
1.21B
288.96M
(FN) Total Revenue
(MTSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FN vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fabrinet and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
11.9%
56.9%
Portfolio components
FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FN and MTSI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (21.01%) compared to MTSI (20.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs MTSI's -80.78%.

MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FN and MTSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer