MTSI vs. IR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MTSI (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.) and IR (Ingersoll-Rand Plc) are both stocks. MTSI operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while IR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, MTSI returned 45.99%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for IR. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MTSI vs. IR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTSI achieves a 123.23% return, which is significantly higher than IR's -9.55% return.

MTSI

• 1D: 8.07%
• 1M: 34.55%
• YTD: 123.23%
• 6M: 114.91%
• 1Y: 208.99%
• 3Y*: 84.15%
• 5Y*: 45.99%
• 10Y*: 26.51%

IR

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -8.14%
• YTD: -9.55%
• 6M: -9.50%
• 1Y: -11.56%
• 3Y*: 5.39%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTSI vs. IR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.	123.23%	31.85%	39.76%	47.59%	-19.57%	42.26%	106.92%	83.32%	-55.41%	-32.98%
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc	-9.55%	-12.34%	17.06%	48.21%	-15.41%	35.85%	24.21%	92.80%	-39.73%	60.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MTSI and IR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2017	0.40

The correlation between MTSI and IR shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS MTSI : $2.33 IR : $1.96
PE Ratio MTSI : 164.24 IR : 36.51
PEG Ratio MTSI : 0.24 IR : 8.68
PS Ratio MTSI : 27.03 IR : 2.75
Total Revenue (TTM) MTSI : $1.07B IR : $7.78B
Gross Profit (TTM) MTSI : $594.25M IR : $2.98B
EBITDA (TTM) MTSI : $245.21M IR : $1.55B

Return for Risk

MTSI vs. IR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTSI

MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 96
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

IR

IR Risk / Return Rank: 24
IR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
IR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
IR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
IR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
IR Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTSI vs. IR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTSI	IR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.26	-0.35	+4.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.08	-0.30	+4.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	0.96	+0.58
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.86	-0.40	+11.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.98	-0.96	+29.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTSI vs. IR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTSI Sharpe Ratio is 4.26, which is higher than the IR Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTSI and IR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTSI	IR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26	-0.35	+4.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.27	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.45	+0.01

Drawdowns

MTSI vs. IR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTSI drawdown since its inception was -80.78%, which is greater than IR's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSI and IR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTSI	IR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.78%	-50.27%	-30.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.74%	-30.56%	+10.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.09%	-36.62%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.86%	-36.62%	-8.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.67%	-31.92%	+25.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.25%	-12.77%	-13.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.40%	12.65%	-5.25%

Volatility

MTSI vs. IR - Volatility Comparison

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) has a higher volatility of 19.65% compared to Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) at 8.46%. This indicates that MTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTSI	IR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.65%	8.46%	+11.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.82%	24.80%	+14.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.39%	32.75%	+16.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.36%	29.95%	+13.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.31%	34.34%	+17.97%

Dividends

MTSI vs. IR - Dividend Comparison

MTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc	0.11%	0.10%	0.09%	0.10%	0.15%	0.03%	0.00%	5.78%
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

MTSI vs. IR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

IR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a gross profit of 792.40M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

IR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported an operating income of 289.70M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.7%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

IR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a net income of 192.10M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTSI and IR in my portfolio?

MTSI and IR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTSI or IR?

MTSI has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to IR (8.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTSI dropped -80.78% vs IR's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.