FN vs. BKV

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

FN (Fabrinet) and BKV (BKV Corp) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while BKV operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past year, FN returned 115.55% vs 1.57% for BKV. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FN vs. BKV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and BKV Corp (BKV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly higher than BKV's -9.58% return.

FN

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -18.48%
• YTD: 26.02%
• 6M: 20.67%
• 1Y: 115.55%
• 3Y*: 64.45%
• 5Y*: 44.47%
• 10Y*: 31.23%

BKV

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -13.22%
• YTD: -9.58%
• 6M: -8.16%
• 1Y: 1.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. BKV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FN Fabrinet	26.02%	107.06%	-3.40%
BKV BKV Corp	-9.58%	14.17%	28.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and BKV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024	0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap FN : $20.78B BKV : $2.51B
EPS FN : $11.65 BKV : $3.24
PE Ratio FN : 49.26 BKV : 7.58
PS Ratio FN : 4.90 BKV : 2.07
PB Ratio FN : 9.02 BKV : 1.09
Total Revenue (TTM) FN : $4.24B BKV : $1.08B
Gross Profit (TTM) FN : $509.75M BKV : $693.49M
EBITDA (TTM) FN : $422.55M BKV : $544.16M

Return for Risk

FN vs. BKV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 86
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BKV

BKV Risk / Return Rank: 41
BKV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BKV Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BKV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BKV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BKV Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. BKV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and BKV Corp (BKV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FN	BKV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	0.02	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	0.34	+1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.04	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.04	0.04	+5.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.51	0.10	+12.41

FN vs. BKV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the BKV Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and BKV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FN vs. BKV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, which is greater than BKV's maximum drawdown of -39.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and BKV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FN	BKV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.46%	-39.98%	-30.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.14%	-24.97%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.14%	-23.66%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.58%	-11.63%	-10.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.31%	10.50%	-1.19%

Volatility

FN vs. BKV - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 24.51% compared to BKV Corp (BKV) at 9.27%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FN	BKV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.51%	9.27%	+15.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.49%	26.17%	+29.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.10%	43.42%	+23.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.82%	43.28%	+10.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.37%	43.28%	+5.09%

Dividends

FN vs. BKV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FN nor BKV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FN vs. BKV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fabrinet and BKV Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

BKV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BKV Corp reported a gross profit of 405.49M and revenue of 432.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.7%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

BKV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BKV Corp reported an operating income of 86.03M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

BKV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BKV Corp reported a net income of 44.08M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FN and BKV in my portfolio?

FN and BKV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FN or BKV?

FN has higher volatility (24.51%) compared to BKV (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs BKV's -39.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.