FMUAX vs. RPFCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FMUAX (Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund) and RPFCX (Davis Appreciation & Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FMUAX returned 5.95%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for RPFCX. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 1.00% expense ratio.

Performance

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUAX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 14.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FMUAX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 5.95%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.

FMUAX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -0.69%
• 6M: 4.11%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 1Y: 12.97%
• 3Y*: 9.05%
• 5Y*: 4.63%
• 10Y*: 5.95%
• ALL TIME*: 6.01%

RPFCX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 11.35%
• YTD: 14.17%
• 1Y: 29.00%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 10.69%
• ALL TIME*: 8.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund	5.65%	9.00%	8.70%	9.81%	-10.68%	10.32%	8.48%	15.16%	-5.24%	11.09%
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund	14.17%	20.90%	9.10%	23.00%	-15.65%	25.74%	4.74%	20.33%	-8.02%	16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUAX and RPFCX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2003	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between FMUAX and RPFCX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FMUAX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMUAX

FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

RPFCX

RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 95
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMUAX	RPFCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.98	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	4.27	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.54	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.99	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.09	15.92	-0.83

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the RPFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUAX and RPFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUAX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, smaller than the maximum RPFCX drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUAX and RPFCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMUAX	RPFCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.43%	-56.39%	+33.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.94%	-6.76%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.18%	-14.82%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.93%	-25.63%	+9.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.46%	-30.72%	+9.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.39%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-7.40%	+4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	1.70%	-0.73%

Volatility

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) is 1.68%, while Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that FMUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMUAX	RPFCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.68%	2.02%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	6.74%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.38%	9.05%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.21%	14.04%	-6.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.14%	14.75%	-6.61%

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FMUAX and RPFCX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.

Dividends

FMUAX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison

FMUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than RPFCX's 5.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund	1.30%	1.23%	2.01%	2.53%	2.25%	4.56%	2.12%	4.00%	7.98%	2.17%	2.36%	2.80%
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund	5.67%	6.09%	1.11%	2.91%	2.63%	0.28%	0.78%	2.03%	1.09%	0.83%	1.09%	1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMUAX and RPFCX in my portfolio?

FMUAX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMUAX or RPFCX?

RPFCX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to FMUAX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUAX dropped -22.43% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.