PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMTL vs. REXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMTL vs. REXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FMTL

1D
0.81%
1M
-11.71%
YTD
13.89%
6M
13.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REXC

1D
-2.70%
1M
-14.19%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTL vs. REXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMTL and REXC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMTL vs. REXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FMTL vs. REXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMTL vs. REXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, which is greater than REXC's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and REXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMTLREXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-21.22%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-18.06%

+3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-7.57%

+2.11%

Volatility

FMTL vs. REXC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMTLREXCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.42%

53.30%

-12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.42%

53.30%

-12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.42%

53.30%

-12.88%

FMTL vs. REXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FMTL and REXC have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

FMTL vs. REXC - Dividend Comparison

FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMTL and REXC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMTL and REXC have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

FMTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.

FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while REXC tracks Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Sprott.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMTL and REXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer