PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMTL vs. ISTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMTL vs. ISTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than ISTM's 1.23% return.


FMTL

1D
0.81%
1M
-11.71%
YTD
13.89%
6M
13.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISTM

1D
1.16%
1M
-10.12%
YTD
1.23%
6M
-3.34%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTL vs. ISTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FMTL
First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF
13.89%21.85%
ISTM
iShares Strategic Metals ETF
1.23%20.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FMTL and ISTM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMTL vs. ISTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ISTM
ISTM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ISTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTL vs. ISTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMTLISTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

FMTL vs. ISTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMTL vs. ISTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, roughly equal to the maximum ISTM drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and ISTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMTLISTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-22.47%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-20.40%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-6.70%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.76%

Volatility

FMTL vs. ISTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMTLISTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.42%

31.69%

+8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.42%

24.36%

+16.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.42%

24.36%

+16.06%

FMTL vs. ISTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMTL vs. ISTM - Dividend Comparison

FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than ISTM's 14.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FMTL
First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF
1.63%0.06%0.00%0.00%
ISTM
iShares Strategic Metals ETF
14.60%14.78%29.62%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMTL and ISTM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISTM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISTM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.

ISTM has the higher dividend yield at 14.60%, compared with 1.63% for FMTL.

FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while ISTM tracks ICE Strategic Re-Industrialization Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.49% for ISTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMTL and ISTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer