FMTL vs. BATT
FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. FMTL is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.
Performance
FMTL vs. BATT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 22.59% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 19.49% return.
FMTL
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- 22.59%
- 6M
- 28.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATT
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- 19.49%
- 6M
- 21.87%
- 1Y
- 85.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- —
FMTL vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 22.59% | 21.85% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 19.49% | 7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTL and BATT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTL vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank
FMTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BATT
FMTL vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMTL | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMTL vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and BATT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTL | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -69.38% | +46.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.09% | -8.54% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -34.68% | +29.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.04% | — |
Volatility
FMTL vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTL | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.44% | 32.35% | +8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.44% | 29.87% | +10.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.44% | 30.74% | +9.70% |
FMTL vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTL vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison
FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than BATT's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.55% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTL and BATT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.
BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.05% for FMTL.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.59% for BATT.
Find the right allocation for FMTL and BATT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer