PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMSDX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund (FMSDX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMSDX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 7.89% return.


FMSDX

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.98%
YTD
8.45%
6M
7.69%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*

PALDX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.48%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.39%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FMSDX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund
8.45%14.10%9.95%11.75%-13.67%17.27%14.56%23.14%-0.91%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.89%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FMSDX and PALDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.84

The correlation between FMSDX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMSDX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMSDX
FMSDX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FMSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FMSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund (FMSDX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMSDXPALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.62

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.69

17.16

-5.47

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMSDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMSDX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMSDXPALDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.73

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.79

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.81

+0.11

Drawdowns

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMSDX drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMSDX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMSDXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-26.16%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-5.96%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-16.06%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-20.47%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-4.09%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.25%

+0.61%

Volatility

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund (FMSDX) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.30%. This indicates that FMSDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMSDXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.30%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

6.18%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

7.89%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.80%

12.11%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

12.69%

-2.09%

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMSDX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMSDX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FMSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than PALDX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMSDX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund
3.47%3.81%3.84%4.23%3.74%2.81%1.79%2.82%4.36%0.00%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.02%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMSDX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMSDX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to PALDX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMSDX dropped -21.64% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMSDX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer