PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMQQ vs. DGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMQQ vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than DGS's 14.53% return.


FMQQ

1D
-2.42%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-20.54%
1Y
-20.58%
3Y*
1.86%
5Y*
10Y*

DGS

1D
-1.37%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.57%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMQQ vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-18.43%10.77%12.45%15.15%-54.03%-15.21%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
14.53%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FMQQ and DGS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.67

The correlation between FMQQ and DGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMQQ vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMQQ
FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMQQ vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMQQDGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.08

1.76

-2.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.52

2.43

-3.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.32

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

2.72

-3.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.37

9.16

-10.52

FMQQ vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMQQ and DGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMQQDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

1.76

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

0.23

-0.85

Drawdowns

FMQQ vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, roughly equal to the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and DGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMQQDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.51%

-61.83%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.82%

-10.06%

-20.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.82%

-19.31%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.91%

-1.40%

-54.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.37%

-12.59%

-36.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.10%

2.98%

+12.12%

Volatility

FMQQ vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) at 5.24%. This indicates that FMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMQQDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

5.24%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

13.03%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

15.56%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.82%

14.87%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.82%

17.32%

+7.50%

FMQQ vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMQQ vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than DGS's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.21%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
0.75%0.61%0.45%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMQQ and DGS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMQQ has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMQQ dropped -64.51% vs DGS's -61.83%.

On 3-year performance, DGS leads with 16.17% vs 1.86% for FMQQ. On fees, DGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DGS has performed better with a 16.17% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.75% for FMQQ.

FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FMQQ and 0.58% for DGS.

DGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMQQ and DGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer