FMIL vs. THLV

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) and THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FMIL is actively managed, while THLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FMIL returned 21.58%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for THLV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for THLV.

Performance

FMIL vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FMIL having a 11.52% return and THLV slightly lower at 11.26%.

FMIL

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 1.97%
• 6M: 9.08%
• YTD: 11.52%
• 1Y: 21.32%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: 16.90%
• 10Y*: —

THLV

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.98%
• 6M: 7.08%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 1Y: 16.35%
• 3Y*: 11.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIL vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	11.52%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.67%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	11.26%	10.50%	9.52%	5.88%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and THLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022	0.75

The correlation between FMIL and THLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FMIL vs. THLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FMIL	THLV
Technology	31.3%	18.1%
Financial Services	13.5%	13.4%
Communication Services	11.1%	0.2%
Industrials	10.7%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	15.7%
Healthcare	8.7%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	13.7%
Energy	4.0%	17.5%
Utilities	2.7%	13.7%
Basic Materials	2.0%	11.9%
Real Estate	1.1%	13.9%

Return for Risk

FMIL vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIL

FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 58
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 66

THLV

THLV Risk / Return Rank: 58
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIL vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMIL	THLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.60	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.27	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.47	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	7.33	+2.12

FMIL vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and THLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and THLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMIL	THLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-13.15%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-6.66%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-13.15%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.70%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-3.69%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	2.24%	+0.02%

Volatility

FMIL vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 2.89%. This indicates that FMIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMIL	THLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	2.89%	+1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	7.90%	+2.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.62%	10.26%	+3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	11.76%	+5.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	11.76%	+5.88%

FMIL vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMIL vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than THLV's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	0.98%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	1.59%	1.77%	1.25%	2.72%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMIL and THLV in my portfolio?

FMIL and THLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMIL or THLV?

FMIL has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to THLV (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs THLV's -13.15%.

Which ETF is better, FMIL or THLV?

On 3-year performance, FMIL leads with 21.58% vs 11.10% for THLV. On fees, FMIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMIL or THLV?

Over the 3-year period, FMIL has performed better with a 21.58% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMIL or THLV?

FMIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMIL or THLV?

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.98% for FMIL.

What is the main difference between FMIL and THLV?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMIL and 0.64% for THLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.