PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FMIL vs. FLRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FMILFLRG
YTD Return32.29%28.73%
1Y Return42.53%37.24%
3Y Return (Ann)17.71%11.75%
Sharpe Ratio3.303.33
Sortino Ratio4.444.51
Omega Ratio1.601.62
Calmar Ratio4.926.11
Martin Ratio23.7023.07
Ulcer Index1.86%1.71%
Daily Std Dev13.32%11.78%
Max Drawdown-15.87%-19.64%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.06%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between FMIL and FLRG is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FMIL vs. FLRG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a 32.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLRG's 28.73% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.28%
17.91%
FMIL
FLRG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMIL vs. FLRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRG's 0.29% expense ratio.


FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
Expense ratio chart for FMIL: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%
Expense ratio chart for FLRG: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMIL vs. FLRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMIL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FMIL, currently valued at 3.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.38
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FMIL, currently valued at 4.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FMIL, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.62
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FMIL, currently valued at 5.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FMIL, currently valued at 24.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0024.21
FLRG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLRG, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLRG, currently valued at 4.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLRG, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.62
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLRG, currently valued at 6.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLRG, currently valued at 23.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0023.07

FMIL vs. FLRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is comparable to the FLRG Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and FLRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.38
3.33
FMIL
FLRG

Dividends

FMIL vs. FLRG - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than FLRG's 1.22% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
0.59%0.23%1.43%1.68%0.48%
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.22%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. FLRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, smaller than the maximum FLRG drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and FLRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.06%
FMIL
FLRG

Volatility

FMIL vs. FLRG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.05%
4.12%
FMIL
FLRG