FMIL vs. NASDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX).
FMIL is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020. NASDX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2000.
Performance
FMIL vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMIL vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF | -3.67% | 17.67% | 27.89% | 25.07% | -0.04% | 24.53% | 18.76% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | -9.12% | 21.00% | 36.91% | 54.69% | -32.57% | 27.32% | 34.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's -9.12% return.
FMIL
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- —
NASDX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMIL vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMIL vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank
FMIL
NASDX
FMIL vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMIL | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.88 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.40 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.31 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 5.01 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMIL | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.88 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.63 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.29 | +0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMIL and NASDX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMIL vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison
FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than NASDX's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF | 1.14% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 3.93% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 7.61% | 3.75% | 2.59% | 1.28% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 1.65% | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
FMIL vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and NASDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMIL | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -83.16% | +63.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -12.70% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -35.33% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -11.90% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.05% | -34.59% | +31.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.32% | -0.56% |
Volatility
FMIL vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FMIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMIL | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 5.38% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 12.45% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 22.55% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 23.03% | -6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 22.61% | -4.83% |