FMIL vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FMIL is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMIL returned 15.85%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

FMIL vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FMIL

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: 23.20%
• 5Y*: 15.85%
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIL vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	10.26%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	18.76%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-19.59%	14.80%	6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and DFND is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.35

The correlation between FMIL and DFND shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FMIL vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FMIL	DFND
Technology	32.4%	24.8%
Communication Services	11.9%	0.8%
Financial Services	11.1%	18.2%
Industrials	10.8%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	3.5%
Healthcare	8.2%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.2%
Energy	4.6%	1.7%
Utilities	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	2.0%

Return for Risk

FMIL vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIL

FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 61
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIL vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMIL	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	0.02	+2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	0.11	+2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.02	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	0.07	+2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	0.13	+12.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMIL vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMIL	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	0.02	+2.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.21	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	0.36	+0.81

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMIL	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-22.65%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-3.44%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-12.56%	-7.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-22.65%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-3.69%	+3.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-5.70%	+2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	3.70%	-1.50%

Volatility

FMIL vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that FMIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMIL	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	0.00%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	6.16%	+3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	10.92%	+1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	22.46%	-5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	19.09%	-1.44%

FMIL vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMIL vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	1.00%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMIL and DFND in my portfolio?

FMIL and DFND have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMIL or DFND?

FMIL has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, FMIL or DFND?

On 5-year performance, FMIL leads with 15.85% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, FMIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMIL or DFND?

Over the 5-year period, FMIL has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMIL or DFND?

FMIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMIL or DFND?

FMIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between FMIL and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMIL and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.