FMIEX vs. PORTX

Last updated Jun 11, 2026

FMIEX (Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares) and PORTX (Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FMIEX returned 11.39%/yr vs 9.46%/yr for PORTX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMIEX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for PORTX.

Performance

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) and Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIEX achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than PORTX's 5.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FMIEX has outperformed PORTX with an annualized return of 11.39%, while PORTX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.46% annualized return.

FMIEX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 14.02%
• 1Y: 26.59%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: 11.24%
• 10Y*: 11.39%

PORTX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 6M: -8.47%
• 1Y: -1.01%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 2.62%
• 10Y*: 9.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares	12.18%	30.93%	8.66%	5.67%	-0.12%	25.11%	2.04%	17.27%	-5.67%	11.21%
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund	5.90%	1.15%	7.67%	19.02%	-24.04%	22.16%	24.56%	28.20%	-7.24%	27.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIEX and PORTX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FMIEX and PORTX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FMIEX vs. PORTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIEX

FMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PORTX

PORTX Risk / Return Rank: 3
PORTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PORTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PORTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PORTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PORTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) and Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMIEX	PORTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	-0.04	+2.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	0.08	+4.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.02	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	-0.04	+3.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.56	-0.08	+15.64

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the PORTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIEX and PORTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIEX drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, roughly equal to the maximum PORTX drawdown of -51.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIEX and PORTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMIEX	PORTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.85%	-51.71%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-20.78%	+13.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.52%	-24.56%	+15.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.63%	-31.32%	+12.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.33%	-31.34%	-7.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-8.90%	+6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.58%	-11.72%	+5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	8.44%	-6.68%

Volatility

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) is 2.77%, while Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that FMIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PORTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMIEX	PORTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	3.70%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.34%	18.65%	-11.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.41%	20.51%	-11.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.74%	19.20%	-6.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	18.20%	-2.47%

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIEX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PORTX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMIEX vs. PORTX - Dividend Comparison

FMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares	5.09%	5.76%	9.02%	3.27%	8.54%	4.34%	1.74%	3.82%	18.46%	16.45%	5.16%	11.75%
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	12.61%	5.84%	3.55%	2.61%	1.85%	2.32%	4.50%	2.46%	4.66%	5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMIEX and PORTX in my portfolio?

FMIEX and PORTX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMIEX or PORTX?

PORTX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FMIEX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIEX dropped -49.85% vs PORTX's -51.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.