FMDE vs. SCHC
FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). FMDE is actively managed, while SCHC is passively managed. Over the past year, FMDE returned 17.86% vs 23.23% for SCHC. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMDE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
FMDE vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMDE achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 6.81% return.
FMDE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
FMDE vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 8.21% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 6.81% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMDE and SCHC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FMDE and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
FMDE vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMDE
SCHC
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
FMDE
SCHC
Industrials
FMDE
SCHC
Financial Services
FMDE
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
FMDE
SCHC
Healthcare
FMDE
SCHC
Energy
FMDE
SCHC
Real Estate
FMDE
SCHC
Utilities
FMDE
SCHC
Basic Materials
FMDE
SCHC
Communication Services
FMDE
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
FMDE
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMDE vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
FMDE
SCHC
FMDE vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMDE | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.87 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 7.03 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMDE | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.47 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.39 | +0.90 |
Drawdowns
FMDE vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMDE drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, smaller than the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDE and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMDE | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.10% | -43.94% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -12.48% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -5.65% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -10.05% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 3.31% | -1.20% |
Volatility
FMDE vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) is 3.52%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that FMDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMDE | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 5.47% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 13.49% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 15.86% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 17.56% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 18.02% | -1.87% |
FMDE vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FMDE vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
FMDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than SCHC's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.43% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMDE and SCHC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to FMDE (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDE dropped -21.10% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 1-year performance, SCHC leads with 23.23% vs 17.86% for FMDE. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, FMDE has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHC has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 1.13% for FMDE.
FMDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FMDE and 0.11% for SCHC.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMDE and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer