PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCX vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMCX vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMCX vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FMCX
FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF
-6.01%11.31%19.10%21.94%-11.16%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
-4.86%19.31%27.16%29.77%-10.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCX achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than MGC's -4.86% return.


FMCX

1D
0.89%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-6.01%
6M
-8.33%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
10Y*

MGC

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMCX vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMCX vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCX
FMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCX vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCXMGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

1.01

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

1.56

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.64

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.45

7.19

-4.74

FMCX vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCX and MGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCXMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.01

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FMCX and MGC is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FMCX vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

FMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than MGC's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCX
FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF
0.37%0.35%2.12%1.34%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
1.01%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Drawdowns

FMCX vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCX drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCX and MGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCXMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-51.93%

+34.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

-11.93%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.63%

-6.33%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-7.12%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

2.72%

+1.02%

Volatility

FMCX vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) is 5.26%, while Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that FMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMCXMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.54%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

9.86%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

18.80%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.26%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

18.19%

-1.90%