PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FMCX vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FMCX and BDGS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FMCX vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.41%
9.06%
FMCX
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FMCX:

1.45

BDGS:

3.96

Sortino Ratio

FMCX:

1.99

BDGS:

7.03

Omega Ratio

FMCX:

1.25

BDGS:

2.23

Calmar Ratio

FMCX:

2.85

BDGS:

8.68

Martin Ratio

FMCX:

8.65

BDGS:

38.02

Ulcer Index

FMCX:

2.21%

BDGS:

0.55%

Daily Std Dev

FMCX:

13.21%

BDGS:

5.25%

Max Drawdown

FMCX:

-17.33%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

FMCX:

-1.56%

BDGS:

-0.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCX achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 2.55% return.


FMCX

YTD

3.47%

1M

1.17%

6M

9.91%

1Y

18.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.55%

1M

0.87%

6M

9.10%

1Y

20.72%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMCX vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for FMCX: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMCX vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMCX is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMCX is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMCX is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMCX is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMCX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMCX is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FMCX vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FMCX, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.453.96
The chart of Sortino ratio for FMCX, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.997.03
The chart of Omega ratio for FMCX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.252.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for FMCX, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.858.68
The chart of Martin ratio for FMCX, currently valued at 8.65, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.6538.02
FMCX
BDGS

The current FMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCX and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.45
3.96
FMCX
BDGS

Dividends

FMCX vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

FMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than BDGS's 1.77% yield.


TTM202420232022
FMCX
FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF
2.04%2.12%1.34%1.19%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%0.00%

Drawdowns

FMCX vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCX drawdown since its inception was -17.33%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCX and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.56%
-0.15%
FMCX
BDGS

Volatility

FMCX vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.22%. This indicates that FMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.76%
1.22%
FMCX
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab