PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCC vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCC vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCC achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCC has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.02%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


FMCC

1D
6.50%
1M
-14.65%
YTD
-40.24%
6M
-44.15%
1Y
-11.53%
3Y*
139.70%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
11.02%

QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCC vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCC
Freddie Mac
-40.24%210.52%284.18%140.59%-57.43%-64.38%-22.33%183.02%-57.94%-32.62%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCC and QQQ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCC vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCC
FMCC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FMCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCC vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCCQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.44

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

3.42

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

13.14

-13.45

FMCC vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCC and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCCQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

2.57

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.80

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.98

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.41

-0.46

Drawdowns

FMCC vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCC drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCC and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCCQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.81%

-82.97%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.31%

-11.96%

-59.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.31%

-22.77%

-48.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.46%

-35.12%

-50.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.97%

-35.12%

-56.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.92%

-0.74%

-93.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-32.78%

-36.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.39%

3.11%

+34.28%

Volatility

FMCC vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Freddie Mac (FMCC) has a higher volatility of 17.51% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that FMCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCCQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.51%

4.51%

+13.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.46%

12.10%

+54.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.23%

15.94%

+77.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.67%

22.37%

+64.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.77%

22.29%

+56.48%

Dividends

FMCC vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FMCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCC
Freddie Mac
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCC and QQQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCC has higher volatility (17.51%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCC dropped -99.81% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCC and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer