FMCC vs. QQQ
FMCC (Freddie Mac) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FMCC returned 11.02%/yr vs 21.84%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FMCC vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMCC achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCC has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.02%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.
FMCC
- 1D
- 6.50%
- 1M
- -14.65%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -44.15%
- 1Y
- -11.53%
- 3Y*
- 139.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
FMCC vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCC Freddie Mac | -40.24% | 210.52% | 284.18% | 140.59% | -57.43% | -64.38% | -22.33% | 183.02% | -57.94% | -32.62% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMCC and QQQ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMCC vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FMCC
QQQ
FMCC vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMCC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.44 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 3.42 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 13.14 | -13.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMCC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 2.57 | -2.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.80 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.98 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.41 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
FMCC vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMCC drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCC and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMCC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -82.97% | -16.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.31% | -11.96% | -59.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.31% | -22.77% | -48.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.46% | -35.12% | -50.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.97% | -35.12% | -56.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.92% | -0.74% | -93.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.87% | -32.78% | -36.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.39% | 3.11% | +34.28% |
Volatility
FMCC vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Freddie Mac (FMCC) has a higher volatility of 17.51% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that FMCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMCC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.51% | 4.51% | +13.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.46% | 12.10% | +54.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.23% | 15.94% | +77.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.67% | 22.37% | +64.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.77% | 22.29% | +56.48% |
Dividends
FMCC vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FMCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCC Freddie Mac | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMCC and QQQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMCC has higher volatility (17.51%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCC dropped -99.81% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMCC and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer